| 000 | 01165nam a22001697a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c211583 _d211583 |
||
| 005 | 20230823111724.0 | ||
| 022 | _a 978-1-80262-864-7 | ||
| 050 | _ahttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1059-43372022000087A005/full/html | ||
| 245 | _aThe Role of the Person in Modern Constitutional Law: How State-inflicted Harms Become Personal | ||
| 260 | _aEmerald | ||
| 310 | _aQuarterly | ||
| 362 | _aVol. 87A,2022 | ||
| 520 | _aThis chapter examines the role of the person in modern constitutional law. Through a reading of two Canadian Supreme Court decisions – RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery and R. v. Malmo-Levine – it suggests that while the person is the subject of modern constitutional law’s protective gaze, it can also sometimes function as a scapegoat, taking the fall for harms engineered in part by the state (harms, in other words, that really ought to attract constitutional scrutiny given constitutional law’s orienting preoccupation with ‘state action’) | ||
| 650 |
_aCriminilisation _vConstitutional theory |
||
| 856 | _uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1059-43372022000087A005/full/html | ||
| 942 | _cE-RESOURCE | ||