The Latin conquest of Constantinople. Edited by Donald E. Queller.
By: Queller, Donald E.
Material type:
Select Bibliography[p111-p113]
The view of a leader, by Geoffrey of Villehardouin.--A view from the ranks, by Robert of Clari.--Venetion greed, by Louis de Mas Latrie.--The treacherous Treaty of 1202, by C. Hopf.--Swabian responsibility, by E. Winkelmann.--The papal party blames the Germans: Innocent's Epistolae and the Gesta Innocentii.--The chief responsibility was Philip of Swabia's, by Comte P. Riant.--The Treaty of 1202 disproved, by G. Hanotaux.--The false treaty perpetuated, by E. Pears.--A French theory of accidents, by J. Tessier.--The evolutionary view of diversion, by W. Norden.--An insoluble problem, by A. Luchaire.--A common-sense approach, by L. Usseglio.--Did Villehardouin conceal the truth? By E. Faral.--When did Alexius arrive in the West? by H. Gregoire.--Alexius' escape to the West, by N. Choniates.--The failure of Christian fraternity, by W. M. Daly.--In defense of Venice, by R. Cessi.--The current synthesis, by E. H. McNeal and R. L. Wolff.--Doctrinal causes, by A. Frolow.--The mind of the mass, by P. Alphandery.--Conclusion and select bibliography (p. 109-113)
There are no comments for this item.